Menu
24matins.uk
Navigation : 
  • News
    • Business
    • Recipe
    • Sport
  • World
  • Health
  • Culture
  • Tech
    • Science
Currently : 
  • Health
  • Entertainment
  • Tech
  • International

AI in Art: Why Creativity Remains a Human Trait

Culture / Entertainment / TV series / Vince Gilligan
By Newsroom,  published 12 November 2025 at 15h06, updated on 12 November 2025 at 15h06.
Culture

Sony Pictures Television / PR-ADN

As artificial intelligence continues to revolutionize creative fields, questions arise about the role of human artists. Despite rapid technological advances, the essence of art remains deeply rooted in human experience, emotion, and expression—elements that technology cannot replicate.

TL;DR

  • Pluribus asserts human creativity amid AI’s rise.
  • Vince Gilligan and Rhea Seehorn critique generative AI.
  • The series sparks debate on technology’s impact on culture.

A Defiant Message: Human-Made Stories in a Digital Age

Opening with the striking assertion, “This series was created by humans,” Pluribus, the latest project from acclaimed showrunner Vince Gilligan, lands on Apple TV at a moment when conversations around the future of artificial intelligence are at a fever pitch. Against the backdrop of this technological giant’s streaming platform, such a proclamation feels pointed—if not outright provocative. The series itself, starring Rhea Seehorn, renowned for her role in Better Call Saul, presents a near-future where an alien invasion transforms humanity into blissfully oblivious zombies—a thinly veiled metaphor for our collective unease about technology’s encroachment.

A Critical Voice from Hollywood

Never one to shy away from controversy, Gilligan has voiced his skepticism about generative AI with notable bluntness. In a recent interview with Variety, he minced no words: “I hate AI.” He describes this technology as nothing more than “wasteful plagiarism,” both expensive and environmentally damaging. Indeed, data cited by Business Insider underscores his concerns—AI data centers reportedly consume vast amounts of electricity and up to five million gallons of water daily for cooling alone. His critique is as much about economics as it is about ethics: “These centibillionaires just want to be the first trillionaires… They’re selling us vapor.” The anxiety here goes beyond just industry disruption—it’s about safeguarding creative authenticity.

The Human Element in Artistry

This position finds resonance with lead actress Rhea Seehorn. She publicly condemned agencies willing to represent Tilly Norwood, a virtual actress powered solely by AI, declaring, “Shame on those who would represent this ‘actress’!” For her, nothing can substitute genuine human sensitivity in artistic creation. A work of art moves us precisely because it carries the imprint of lived experience—a conviction that is woven directly into the narrative fabric of Pluribus.

Several factors explain this deep-rooted apprehension:

  • The specter of an AI singularity outpacing human intelligence.
  • The risk of sentient digital entities exploited for profit.
  • The dilution of culture through soulless, algorithm-driven content.

Cultural Resilience Amid Technological Upheaval

While some prominent voices in the industry—such as filmmaker Guillermo del Toro—have issued even starker warnings (del Toro quipped he’d rather die than use AI), Gilligan offers a nuanced coda: perhaps history will prove his fears unfounded. Yet for him, for Seehorn, and likely many other creators, the struggle is clear—to defend what makes culture unique: its irreducible humanity.

Le Récap
  • TL;DR
  • A Defiant Message: Human-Made Stories in a Digital Age
  • A Critical Voice from Hollywood
  • The Human Element in Artistry
  • Cultural Resilience Amid Technological Upheaval
Learn more
  • Stephen King Seeks Control Over The Shawshank Redemption
  • Avatar 3 Release Date and Future of James Cameron’s Franchise
  • Aragorn Casting Rumors for The Hunt for Gollum Movie
  • About Us
© 2025 - All rights reserved on 24matins.uk site content